Doc's Daily Commentary

Mind Of Mav

The Biggest Existential Risks To Bitcoin In 2021

Bitcoin has had an interesting year under the backdrop of regulation and gaining institutional acceptance. However, it’s not all been smooth-sailing.

In July, the US’ OCC (Office of the Comptroller of the Currency) passed a law that allowed banks to offer custody services for digital assets. This was a massive milestone in the goal of broad cryptocurrency adoption, finally providing some regulatory certainty in Bitcoin banking.

Not too far after in September, the state of Wyoming awarded the well-known exchange Kraken a license to create the first cryptocurrency bank in the US — Kraken Financial. Expected around Q1 2021, customers of Kraken could pay bills or receive salaries in cryptocurrency and hold cryptocurrencies with the bank. Future services could include crypto debit cards and staking.

Kraken won’t be the only cryptocurrency bank in the US — they will have competition from Avanti who was granted the same bank charter a month later. By all accounts, it seems like cryptocurrencies are here to stay and that American citizens will be able to hold their digital assets in the same way they hold their dollars.

Overall, I see three main existential threats, or at the very least, risks on Bitcoin’s horizon:


Compared to that of traditional assets like stocks and bonds, the safekeeping of bitcoin is different. Bitcoin adds a new dimension to custody and the ownership of assets. Cryptography enforces bitcoin’s ownership: the possession of digital private keys equates to ownership. The highly technical management of private keys requires solutions that do not exist in traditional asset custody.

In the last ten years, the mismanagement of private keys has cost investors hundreds of millions of dollars, without legal recourse. Even the largest bitcoin players have suffered from security breaches in the last two years, several retail exchanges losing $800 million collectively in client funds. While self-managed custody provides individuals with the optimal protection for their bitcoin, fiduciary responsibilities preclude institutional investors from the custody of bitcoin.

Under the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Custody Rule, for example, US institutions must adopt full-service third-party solutions to custody bitcoin. Fortunately, an ecosystem is evolving that should enable access to bitcoin with custodial services on par with traditional asset management services.


One of bitcoin’s primary value propositions is its ability to exchange and store value “permissionlessly”. In other words, I believe it will not succumb to the arbitrary imposition of financial regulations. As a result, regulators are questioning how bitcoin can and should be regulated. As a borderless, internet-native asset, bitcoin operates without regard to jurisdiction, though nation-states can and do treat it differently. Some countries like Bolivia have banned it, while others like Malta have created national strategies promoting it.

In the US, bitcoin falls in the regulatory cracks between stocks and commodities. Potentially due to concern that they would become obsolete in a fast-changing environment, the SEC has not pioneered bitcoin-specific policies. Without FDIC insurance and formal depositor rights, bitcoin’s infrastructure also is unregulated. I believe investors have an opportunity to capitalize on the vacuum created by this regulatory uncertainty. Like the Internet, because the Bitcoin blockchain and the bitcoin cryptocurrency are here to stay, governments are likely to discover ways to deploy them to their advantage.


Ironically, institutional adoption could present an existential risk to bitcoin’s value proposition.

Specifically, bitcoin users and investors could fall prey to the custody of assets by third parties, limiting the satisfaction of the first two economic assurances explained in Part 1: 1) Value should be exchanged globally and freely, and 2) Wealth should be owned wholly and protected.

In my view, institutional adoption and Bitcoin’s core principles may be mutually exclusive.

Because institutions must custody bitcoin with third party services, a custodial “banking” layer could result in just a few trusted parties dominating transactions. Users drawn to the most cost-efficient solutions also could transact with IOUs, saving on transaction costs and further diminishing Bitcoin’s ability to satisfy the first two economic assurances.

As noted in a recently published article by Deribit Insights Why Bitcoin Might Not Survive A Bitcoin Standard, bitcoin could succumb to the fate of gold in 1933 and 1970, when the US government cancelled redemptions and abandoned the gold standard, eliminating its core value proposition.23 Today, more than 4 million BTC – 22% of bitcoin’s circulating supply – is in held in centralized custodial solutions.

Final Remarks

Bitcoin is an emerging monetary asset. I believe its rapid growth has positioned bitcoin to earn an allocation in well-diversified investment portfolios.

Bitcoin offers one of the most compelling risk-reward profiles among assets, as my analysis suggests it should scale from roughly $200 billion today to $1-5 trillion network capitalization during the next five to
ten years. In my view, capital allocators must consider the opportunity cost that will be associated with ignoring bitcoin as a new asset class.

What’s been clear is that opportunity cost has skewed one certain direction for nearly the entirety of Bitcoin’s existance.

The ReadySetCrypto "Three Token Pillars" Community Portfolio (V3)

Add your vote to the V3 Portfolio (Phase 3) by clicking here.

View V3 Portfolio (Phase 2) by clicking here.

View V3 Portfolio (Phase 1) by clicking here.

Read the V3 Portfolio guide by clicking here.

What is the goal of this portfolio?

The “Three Token Pillars” portfolio is democratically proportioned between the Three Pillars of the Token Economy & Interchain:

CryptoCurreny – Security Tokens (STO) – Decentralized Finance (DeFi)

With this portfolio, we will identify and take advantage of the opportunities within the Three
Pillars of ReadySetCrypto. We aim to Capitalise on the collective knowledge and experience of the RSC
community & build model portfolios containing the premier companies and projects
in the industry and manage risk allocation suitable for as many people as

The Second Phase of the RSC Community Portfolio V3 was to give us a general idea of the weightings people desire in each of the three pillars and also member’s risk tolerance. The Third Phase of the RSC Community Portfolio V3 has us closing in on a finalized portfolio allocation before we consolidated onto the highest quality projects.

Our Current Allocation As Of Phase Three:

Move Your Mouse Over Charts Below For More Information

The ReadySetCrypto "Top Ten Crypto" Community Portfolio (V4)

Add your vote to the V4 Portfolio by clicking here.

Read about building Crypto Portfolio Diversity by clicking here.

What is the goal of this portfolio? 

The “Top Ten Crypto” portfolio is a democratically proportioned portfolio balanced based on votes from members of the RSC community as to what they believe are the top 10 projects by potential.
This portfolio should be much more useful given the ever-changing market dynamics. In short, you rank the projects you believe deserve a spot in the top 10. It should represent a portfolio and rank that you believe will stand the test of time. Once we have a good cross-section, we can study and make an assessment as to where we see value and perhaps where some diamonds in the rough opportunities exist. In a perfect world, we will end up with a Pareto-style distribution that describes the largest value capture in the market.
To give an update on the position, each one listed in low to high relative risk:
SoV/money == BTC, DCR
Platforms == ETH, XTZ
Private Money == XMR / ZEC / ZEN
DeFi == MKR / SNX and stablecoins
It is the most realistic way for us to distill the entirety of what we have learned (and that includes the RSC community opinion). We have an array of articles that have gradually picked off one by one different projects, some of which end up being many thousands of words to come to this conclusion. It is not capitulation because we all remain in the market. It is simply a consolidation of quality. We seek the cream of the crop as the milk turns sour on aggregate.

Current Top 10 Rankings:



Move Your Mouse Over Charts Below For More Information

Our Discord

Join Our Crypto Trader & Investor Chatrooms by clicking here!

Please DM us with your email address if you are a full OMNIA member and want to be given full Discord privileges.