Doc's Daily Commentary

Mind Of Mav

Welcome To 2021: The New Bitcoin Narrative 

“Is Bitcoin a bubble?”

A timeless question asked every time Bitcoin makes the news for breaking an all-time high price. This was also the case back in late 2017 when Bitcoin hit $19,000 USD.

And back then, it turned out it was a bubble — to a large extent at least. Pushed by believers as “the future of payments”, Bitcoin still had serious scaling challenges that prohibited it from becoming a better payment alternative than the likes of Visa and Paypal. Once traders realized this the speculation lost its steam and Bitcoin came crashing by almost 80% by early 2018.

Fast forward to today.

Bitcoin has been on yet another spectacular run. At a price per coin of between $32,000-$34,000 USD at the time of writing, the world’s first cryptocurrency has defied the odds and blasted past the previous all-time high from 2017 without much of a sweat.

A glimpse at the price starting from 2013 shows a staggering 29,000% increase, making it the best performing “asset” of the last decade. It has not been a smooth ride, however, as there were clearly multiple rounds of boom-and-bust cycles with Bitcoin gaining and losing value at high volatility.

To people unfamiliar with Bitcoin’s history, the current price level may look like another obvious bubble waiting to burst at any second. But to many “Bitcoiners”, and especially die-hard believers known as “Bitcoin Maximalists” (those who shun any other cryptocurrency as a worthless endeavor and a mostly misapplication of Bitcoin’s blockchain technology), that is not the case. To them, Bitcoin at over $30,000 represents the beginning of yet another bull run that, during its climax, will reach much bigger heights.

Put aside the beliefs of cypherpunks and Bitcoin Maximalists. There is an increasing number of serious investors, including the likes of Paul Tudor Jones and Stanley Druckenmiller, who believe that Bitcoin is undervalued. To get a sense, bookmark Paul Tudor Jones’s letter from May 2020 — The Great Monetary Inflation for later reading. It’s an interesting perspective from an unlikely source.

This begs the question — why is a certain, increasingly larger subset convinced that Bitcoin still has ways to go during this bull run?

Is Bitcoin about to crash like in 2017 and go back to ~$4,000 per coin?

Or will it “be different this time”? Ah, those famous last words.

To understand what is happening with Bitcoin at this moment and get a clue for the short-to-medium term price, we first need to understand what has happened in its past.

Bitcoin has been going through similar boom and bust cycles in the past 8 years, every time ending at a price higher than where it started

Bitcoin has been through 2 of these bull runs in the past 8 years, each pretty much exactly 4 years apart. To properly see them, we need to zoom in because each cycle completely dwarfs the other.

 

Image for post

The first major bull run was in late 2013, when the price grew by 90%, from $100 to $1,100 USD, in the span of months. It subsequently crashed hard, but higher than where it started — to about $250.

 

Image for post

Zooming in: the 2013 Boom & Bust Cycle. Notice how despite a hard crash, the Bitcoin price coming out of the cycle is higher than going in

A very similar cycle repeated itself 4 years later in late 2017. The price again ballooned by over 90%, from $1,000 to $19,000, in the span of 7 months. This was followed again by a hard crash to $4,000.

 

Image for post

The 2017 Boom & Bust Cycle looked awfully familiar to 2013, just with higher prices

Now, another 4 years later in the beginning of 2021, many Bitcoin proponents believe we are seeing a new cycle start. And there is evidence: The Bitcoin price has already shot above the previous cycle’s all-time high in December 2020.

Bitcoin proponents believe the climax is still months away. If it resembles the last two bull runs again, their expectation is that Bitcoin will peak in late 2021 at a price north of $100,000.

 

Image for post

Bitcoiners believe we are in the beginning of a new cycle, with the crypto asset on its way to new heights that will dwarf the prices of previous cycles

What is fascinating and telling, is that there is no coincidence that these cycles are all 4 years apart. Let‘s understand why.

A key driver of these price cycles are Bitcoin’s supply “halvings” — supply shocks that are programmed into Bitcoin to occur every 4 years

Every 4 years, Bitcoin goes through a programmed supply restriction— what is known as the “halving” — where its daily added supply gets cut in half. This added supply is called the “Block Reward”, which is a set number of newly created Bitcoins whenever a new block in the Bitcoin blockchain is mined, which, on average, is every 10 minutes.

In early 2020 the Block Reward was 12.5 of newly mined Bitcoins. Since May 2020, that number was cut in half to 6.25 Bitcoins per block which reduced the rate of increase in the supply stock of Bitcoin.

Assuming no change in demand, a decrease in supply like this naturally exerts upward pressure on the price of Bitcoin every 4 years.

It usually takes 6–15 months for the halving effect to play out, which is why we see these price cycles take place a set while after the halving occurs. For a visual illustration of the effect of a Bitcoin halving on its price, check out this great twitter thread.

Logging the price of Bitcoin shows the supposed effect of the halving on the price, and hints at which stage in the bull market we are in

 

Image for post

A logged view of the price shows an interesting picture, and suggests that the halvings are not “priced in” unlike what conventional investment theory would tell you.

Bitcoin is still a nascent technology and a lot of buyers don’t completely understand its inner workings (which to be fair, is not not-complex), so it is not unreasonable to assume the market is not yet completely price efficient. To fully “get” Bitcoin from every angle, one arguably needs a foundational understanding across cryptography, computer science, economics & finance, game theory, and even history itself. If you ever wondered why Bitcoin is rather difficult to fully grasp, that’s why.

So these price cycles seem to repeat themselves and seem to correlate with a reduction in supply which is part of Bitcoin’s code and programmed to take place every 4 years. What about the demand side of things? After all, if demand is non-existent or even just decreasing, supply shocks alone will not raise the price.

Bitcoin’s demand has been skyrocketing thanks to interest from institutional investors

Here is one head-scratching statistic: Payment services providers PayPal and Square have been scooping up more Bitcoin on behalf of their users than the roughly 900 Bitcoins that are mined every day (source). And that is not even the main source of this cycle’s increasing demand.

For the first time, we’ve seen substantial institutional money take a large position in Bitcoin. Investment funds, private corporations, trust funds, and even historically conservative insurance companies like 169 year old MassMutual have started to convert a percentage of their cash into Bitcoin.

MassMutual converted $100 million into Bitcoin. Microstrategy, a Business Intelligence software company, converted their entire cash reserves (worth over $2 billion now) into Bitcoin. Check out the growing list of institutional investors here.

Why are institutional investors suddenly buying Bitcoin?

Institutional Investors are looking for an insurance policy (a hedge) against unprecedented fiscal and monetary policy by governments and central banks

Unlike previous bull runs, the value proposition — or the narrative behind why Bitcoin should be more valuable — resonates more than ever during the current macroeconomic backdrop.

Central banks have cut interest rates to record lows and are creating new money via quantitative easing (QE) at a pace we have never seen before.

To illustrate this, consider that 25% of all money ever was created by central banks this year alone — and let that sink in for a minute.

 

Image for post

25%+ of the M2 money supply was created in 2020 alone — more in a year than ever in history. Source

Likewise, governments, which did not run at a surplus during the good economic times we enjoyed prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, are going head over heels into debt via debt monetization (the act of creating new money out of thin air and denoting it as debt you owe — more on that here) to provide a stimulus for a hurting economy.

“It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning.”

— Henry Ford

A discussion of the merits of this unprecedented increase in money supply and debt monetization is beyond the scope of this post (and the author’s expertise; although it’s questionable whether any expertise in something that has had little to no precedent can be credibly claimed by any “expert”), but it provides context for why investors are getting antsy about holding cash. The need for a safe haven store of value to hedge against inflation has become apparent.

Bitcoin’s latest narrative: An inflation-resistant Store of Value

Prices for relatively new, intangible, and highly speculative assets like Bitcoin are not based on yield (spoiler: there is none) or any sort of “fundamentals” — rather, they are more so narrative-driven.

That is, Bitcoin’s price is driven by prevailing (but yet to be proven) theses about its future state that drives the demand and thus the price to new heights.

These narratives have changed every price cycle, and understanding how the previous narratives eventually failed, resulting in the aforementioned crashes, helps us understand whether this cycle things will turn out the same (a hard crash) or different (no crashes but less severe corrections).

The 2012–2013 Cycle Narrative: Bitcoin as New, Electronic Cash

Narrative buster: At only 3 years old, Bitcoin was much too new and the surrounding ecosystem of developers, exchanges, and payment services integrations were not mature enough for it to grow beyond a proof of concept used by a fraction of very early adopters. Once the biggest exchange at the time, Mt. Gox, revealed that it has lost the keys to the majority of the Bitcoin they hold for their buyers, it and the Bitcoin price imploded, ending the bull run.

The 2016–2017 Cycle Narrative: Bitcoin as a Commercial Payment Network

Narrative buster: As Bitcoin gained more mainstream attention and more adoption as a medium of exchange (together with a more developed ecosystem that was lacking in 2013), scaling issues surfaced: due to inherent redundancies in the underlying technology (called the Bitcoin blockchain), transaction costs for sending Bitcoin grew prohibitively high for small, day to day purchases such as a cup of coffee. Nonetheless, speculation for Bitcoin and other newly create cryptocurrencies (known as Initial Coin Offerings or ICOs) intensified. It all again came crashing down as it became clear that Bitcoin failed to live up to its narrative as a suitable payment method for any transaction.

The 2020–2021 (Present) Cycle Narrative: Bitcoin as an Uncorrelated Store of Value

This time around, Bitcoin has yet again a new narrative. The value proposition of Bitcoin is, quite literally, to hold value. A Store of Value, akin to Gold. In fact, Bitcoin has properties which, its proponents argue, make it an excellent store of value:

Bitcoin is absolutely scarce. There will ever be only 21 million Bitcoins. No additional Bitcoins can be issued, and thus the value of existing Bitcoins can not be depreciated in that way unlike other stores of value like government issued (i.e. fiat) money (via QE for example) or even Gold (2% average inflation rate via mining)

Bitcoin is decentralized. There is no centralized authority like a bank that controls the issuance, manages the transfer, or manipulates the price of Bitcoin by setting (artificial) interest rates. Bitcoin is a completely peer to peer solution to money that does not require a trusted third party as it is a “trustless” solution (more on that here)

Bitcoin is easily transportable. It can be sent anywhere in the world fast and for relatively little fees. You can send billions worth of dollars in Bitcoin for a 50 cent fee internationally in less than 20 minutes. This would be unthinkable with Gold or fiat. Just ask the German government, which recently spent close to 8 million euros to repatriate their Gold.

Bitcoin is divisable. Unlike Gold, Bitcoin can easily be divided into a 100,000,000th fraction of a coin (known fittingly as a “Satoshi”, after the name of its pseudonymous creator) that can be traded and owned.

Bitcoin is secure. Bitcoin’s blockchain is the most secure in the world. To attack the Bitcoin network and effectively hijack it (known as the “51% attack”), one would have to amass computing power worth in the billions to outcompute the existing computing power behind Bitcoin. Any attacker is better off using that power to mine Bitcoin for profit which explains why since its inception 12 years ago, we’ve yet to see Bitcoin being “hacked”.

All these inherent properties give credence to the “Store of Value” narrative and explain why institutional investors and long time Bitcoin believers are still buying in at these seemingly exorbitant prices.

But the question remains, what will the narrative buster be this time?

Will there be one, causing Bitcoin to crash hard again, or is this Bitcoin’s destiny, to serve the world as its defacto Store of Value in a time of abundant fiat money?

There is no convincing narrative-buster for Bitcoin’s Store of Value proposition, poising Bitcoin to repeat a new price cycle 2021 but without the extreme crashes of the past

As we’ve seen, Bitcoin has “crashed” pretty hard every bull run. This time around however, these corrections will be less frequent and less severe. This is because Bitcoin’s current Store of Value narrative will likely not be invalidated (opinion), as happened during the previous bull runs with their respective narratives.

Let’s take a look at a couple of factors as evidence for why Bitcoin proponents believe the Store of Value narrative will hold— view them as supply and demand tailwinds that result in a sustained upwards pressure on price, if you will:

Institutional investors have long time horizons. Unlike retail investors, which were driving demand in previous bull runs, institutional investors have longer time horizons and react less to short term price swings. Grayscale Bitcoin Trust, a trust fund that holds Bitcoin on behalf of investors, holds 572,644 Bitcoins which will never be sold —and is currently on a buying spree due to investor demand.

More and more HODLERS. Even among retail investors, there is strong evidence indicating more buy and hold Bitcoin rather than trade it (these are known as HODLERS, which is a misspelling of the term “Hold” that was memed into common Bitcoin verbiage back in 2013). The fact that no one who has ever bought Bitcoin has lost money, provided they never sold, plays a key role. There’s also something cult-like about hardcore believers — and I mean that in a good way. To them, Bitcoin represents an entirely new way of how we view money and store wealth. It’s easy to part with an asset for profit; it’s harder to part with an idea. To many, Bitcoin represents both an asset and an ideal of a different future.

Age — Bitcoin has now been around for 12 years without a failure or hack. Time adds credibility and with every additional year Bitcoin exists, the case for it as a new financial asset that is here to stay becomes proportionally stronger (this is known as the Lindy effect, as popularised by the brilliant Nassim Taleb). At a fundamental level, anything a group of people collectively agrees to be money can be money — there’s no intrinsic value required. With every day that passes and Bitcoin sticks around as this new type of money, confidence in it and its narrative grows.

The current macroeconomic environment: No end to cheap money in sight. We live in a time of cheap fiat money and that will likely be the case for the foreseeable future. The US federal reserve itself indicated that they changed their approach to inflation, allowing consumer price inflation to overshoot their historical 2% target for the first time. This means saving accounts will continue to pay little to no interest, making saving money in the bank a fruitless endeavor.

An aside: arguably inflation is already here, and it is hiding in plain sight in the asset classes. When, during a pandemic nonetheless, asset prices are at all-time highs across the board (stocks, bond, real estate, precious metals, and Bitcoin) our current use of the term “inflation” referring only to increases in the consumer price index (CPI) seems seriously outdated at best and deceptive at worst.

Tax (dis)incentives. Since Bitcoin is classified as a commodity by governments in most countries, trading Bitcoin frequently introduces tax complications since capital gains taxes apply. This favors the Store of Value narrative as well, as people are incentivized to hold rather than sell Bitcoin to avoid complicated taxes. Talk about unintended consequences from unexpected sources.

Combine these reasons with Bitcoin’s absolutely scarce supply and its other technical properties discussed earlier, and the case for Bitcoin as a Store of Value becomes a really strong one in the eyes of more people.

There are risks, but none seriously narrative threatening

Bitcoin is still a speculative asset, however — speculation that it will become the world’s defacto Store of Value in the future; nothing is guaranteed. And there are of course other risks.

Chances are high that a major government will yet again try to ban Bitcoin or introduce heavy-handed regulation to stifle its adoption, as Bitcoin does introduce competition to the traditional monopoly government has over money. However, such attempts won’t be that effective because of Bitcoin’s decentralization and (therefore) censorship resistance. Banning Bitcoin (China tried in 2013 and failed) is like banning the internet, but surely news like this will scare some investors for a period of time.

There are also still shady practices in the non-Bitcoin cryptocurrency space which may rub off on Bitcoin purely from a perception perspective, leading to potential temporary corrections in its price.

None of these are narrative threatening, however, or very likely to take place, as they don’t challenge Bitcoin’s use as a Store of Value directly. But it’s a good reminder that this space is still very early and there will be challenges ahead. To overcome them will still require serious conviction from Bitcoin holders. But the Store of Value narrative has made it easier than ever for an increasing number of investors to have conviction.

Bitcoin in 2021: A new financial asset class that is here to stay

Narratives are ways we make sense of so many things in the world, and especially when there is not much to go off by, such as with nascent technology like Bitcoin.

Every new price cycle Bitcoin has tried on a new narrative and its price curve, its spectacular rise and fall provided us the information that Bitcoin did not yet find its product-market-fit (or rather, technology-narrative-fit).

In this price cycle, which is just getting started if one believes history is a guide and Bitcoin’s halvings matter, the new Store of Value narrative seems poised to become Bitcoin’s destiny. The narrative has strong support by a myriad of internal and external factors touched on in this article, without the same challenges that previous narratives had.

Investors are looking for a viable “savings instrument”, and Bitcoin might be the answer once its price has settled in the future. What we are seeing at the moment is investors and believers front running this future. If Bitcoin becomes as valuable as Gold, which has historically been the defacto Store of Value, a $500,000 price tag per Bitcoin is the logical result based on Gold’s market capitalization alone (which is ~$11 trillion).

Bitcoin turned 12 years old today. On January 3rd, 2009 its pseudonymous creator Satoshi Nakamoto, which has since disappeared, mined the first “genesis” block. 2021 will determine if Bitcoin, at 12, has finally grown up enough to become a serious financial asset class that is here to stay – and so far, it’s looking like it’s on its way.

Welcome to 2021.

The ReadySetCrypto "Three Token Pillars" Community Portfolio (V3)

Add your vote to the V3 Portfolio (Phase 3) by clicking here.

View V3 Portfolio (Phase 2) by clicking here.

View V3 Portfolio (Phase 1) by clicking here.

Read the V3 Portfolio guide by clicking here.

What is the goal of this portfolio?

The “Three Token Pillars” portfolio is democratically proportioned between the Three Pillars of the Token Economy & Interchain:

CryptoCurreny – Security Tokens (STO) – Decentralized Finance (DeFi)

With this portfolio, we will identify and take advantage of the opportunities within the Three
Pillars of ReadySetCrypto. We aim to Capitalise on the collective knowledge and experience of the RSC
community & build model portfolios containing the premier companies and projects
in the industry and manage risk allocation suitable for as many people as
possible.

The Second Phase of the RSC Community Portfolio V3 was to give us a general idea of the weightings people desire in each of the three pillars and also member’s risk tolerance. The Third Phase of the RSC Community Portfolio V3 has us closing in on a finalized portfolio allocation before we consolidated onto the highest quality projects.

Our Current Allocation As Of Phase Three:

Move Your Mouse Over Charts Below For More Information

The ReadySetCrypto "Top Ten Crypto" Community Portfolio (V4)

Add your vote to the V4 Portfolio by clicking here.

Read about building Crypto Portfolio Diversity by clicking here.

What is the goal of this portfolio? 

The “Top Ten Crypto” portfolio is a democratically proportioned portfolio balanced based on votes from members of the RSC community as to what they believe are the top 10 projects by potential.
This portfolio should be much more useful given the ever-changing market dynamics. In short, you rank the projects you believe deserve a spot in the top 10. It should represent a portfolio and rank that you believe will stand the test of time. Once we have a good cross-section, we can study and make an assessment as to where we see value and perhaps where some diamonds in the rough opportunities exist. In a perfect world, we will end up with a Pareto-style distribution that describes the largest value capture in the market.
To give an update on the position, each one listed in low to high relative risk:
SoV/money == BTC, DCR
Platforms == ETH, XTZ
Private Money == XMR / ZEC / ZEN
DeFi == MKR / SNX and stablecoins
It is the most realistic way for us to distill the entirety of what we have learned (and that includes the RSC community opinion). We have an array of articles that have gradually picked off one by one different projects, some of which end up being many thousands of words to come to this conclusion. It is not capitulation because we all remain in the market. It is simply a consolidation of quality. We seek the cream of the crop as the milk turns sour on aggregate.

Current Top 10 Rankings:

 

 

Move Your Mouse Over Charts Below For More Information

Our Discord

Join Our Crypto Trader & Investor Chatrooms by clicking here!

Please DM us with your email address if you are a full OMNIA member and want to be given full Discord privileges.