Doc's Daily Commentary

Mind Of Mav

DeFi vs. CeFi: Why It Matters


The prospects of decentralized finance have undoubtedly presented a new and productive alternative for traditional financial systems.

Since 2020, the debate over DeFi vs CeFi or centralized finance is gaining momentum in radical proportions in recent times. Decentralized finance has emerged as a prominent contributor to resolving numerous pitfalls in traditional financial services.

However, it is reasonable to find out the difference between DeFi and CeFi to ascertain the validity of pursuing DeFi as an alternative to financial systems that have been functional for an inexplicably long period.

Is it reasonable to shift from the financial systems trusted by all individuals using financial services worldwide? The following discussion dives into a head-to-head comparison to provide a better impression of the CeFi DeFi debate.


Starting with the Definitions – DeFi and CeFi

Before the reflection on the differences between CeFi and DeFi, let us focus on what is CeFi. It is an abbreviation for centralized finance referring to the closed financial markets. On the other hand, when we reflect on what is DeFi, it is evident that it is the opposite of CeFi.

Decentralized finance points out the different tools, frameworks, and technologies that enable open, secure access to financial services with assurance of flexibility and control.

The Dominant Traits of CeFi

The definitions of DeFi and CeFi point out the differentiating factor of a centralized entity, which dictates the level of trust with each approach. If the trust is vested in the business itself, you can identify it as a trait of CeFi.

As a centralized approach, CeFi implies that a business has to ensure management, execution, and sustenance of trust with ethical measures at any cost.

In the event of a breach of trust, end-users are less likely to exhibit trust in a CeFi business. CeFi also presents credible advantages of flexibility by adapting services such as fiat conversions, direct service, and cross-chain exchanges according to customer needs.

To improve our understanding of DeFi vs CeFi, let us discover how CeFi is different from DeFi before proceeding towards the distinctive factors about DeFi that separate it from CeFi.

Here is a table that can help you point out the DeFi vs CeFi differences easily in the simplest way possible:


CEX and CeFi

The centralized exchanges accompany vulnerabilities of user funds to internal and external threats. Centralized services manage user funds and data in centralized systems, thereby implying the lack of absolute safety for user funds and information.

The DeFi vs CeFi debate turns in favor of the former due to security concerns.

However, centralized exchanges offer cryptocurrency trading and trading functionalities like margin trading, lending, borrowing, and OTC, among others.

Therefore, CeFi brings flexibility for customers while addressing issues that could take specialized efforts and guidance for resolution.

Flexibility to Convert Fiat Currency

Another highlight in the DeFi vs CeFi debate in favor of CeFi is the flexibility of working with fiat. The flexibility accompanied by a centralized entity responsible for managing fiat allows formidable control to customers for ensuring fiat conversions.

Cross-Chain Functionalities

CeFi is also known for the facility of cross-chain services with the support for cryptocurrency trading. Users can ensure LTC to XRP or BTC to LTC conversions without depending on blockchain technology underlying different cryptocurrencies.

On the other hand, DeFi is not capable of providing cross-chain services. For example, the atomic cross-chain swaps could be highly time-consuming with higher latency, thereby preventing the efficiency of DeFi services.

So, CeFi emerges as a winner in the DeFi vs CeFi debate regarding cross-chain services. CeFi leverages multiple chains for taking custody of funds before permitting the conversion or trading of coins.

End-users could easily get the benefits of converting currency through orders for sales or purchase. The transfer of ownership also improves the simplicity and intuitiveness of CeFi applications in cross-chain services.

How is DeFi Better than CeFi – DeFi vs CeFi

After a comparative evaluation of CeFi vs DeFi, let us turn the tables and look from the other perspective. DeFi does not impose any requirements for establishing user identity for accessing financial services.

Rather than depending on the personal information of users, DeFi services provide a unique identification number to users for leveraging banking services.

As a result, users have the assurance of the safety of their funds and data with all aspects of security vested in the user’s responsibility. Let us take a look at the other factors in the DeFi vs CeFi comparison from the perspective of DeFi.

Decentralized Transactions

DeFi is capable of providing decentralized exchange platforms that do not have any centralized systems. DEX platforms leverage smart contracts in unison with decentralized protocol solutions and Ethereum.

The design of smart contracts also ensures better automation of fulfilling necessary orders. Users of DEX-based systems don’t have to go through the sign-up process for using the concerned service.

The connection of the user wallet to DEX service is enough to enable trade on DEX platforms. Apart from the setback of lack of support for cross-service solutions, DEX services enable trading in cryptocurrencies without funds to withdraw from user wallets.

The transfer of funds happens only after the execution of the trade to provide a comprehensive guarantee of the safety of funds.

No Need of Permissions

DeFi vs CeFi debate also points out the permissionless nature of the former. As a result, users don’t need a KYC process like in CeFi services to use DeFi services. Users can connect their wallets to DeFi service, followed by taking necessary actions like fund transfers, trading, and many others.

Additionally, there is no restriction on access to DeFi services due to its permissionless nature. Furthermore, enterprises can leverage DeFi services for the welfare of the general public. At the same time, enterprises can also use DeFi services to expand their business to unreachable geographic locations.

Avenues for Innovation

Another promising highlight in favor of DeFi in the DeFi vs CeFi debate is the support for innovation. Many players in the DeFi ecosystem are striving for innovation at a rapid pace. The experiments on leveraging decentralization for reforming the existing finance market, along with the arrival of new financial services paint DeFi, in a positive light.

On the other hand, CeFi does not foster innovation due to the centralized approach, albeit without absolving it completely. DeFi also presents a better potential for uncovering new assets with the facility of incentives to users involved in the stages of asset development and growth.

Trustless System

The final bit of comparison between DeFi and CeFi points out directly to the trustless factor. The trust factor in DeFi depends on the complete process rather than on a specific system. As a result, users can assure their funds from theft or wrong transfers with DeFi.

The auditing of DeFi services by developers informed users, and interested entities ensure better support for transparency and monitoring of transactions. Therefore, DeFi services present a global approach in comparison to closed CeFi services.


On a concluding note, you can notice the various pointers in a DeFi vs CeFi debate. The facility of liquidity is a formidable similarity amidst all the differences between the two financial systems. Both CeFi and DeFi allocate equal price value for specific assets. However, DeFi presents a formidable advantage over CeFi in many aspects, albeit failing in the facility of cross-chain services.

Except for such setbacks, DeFi is a clear and promising alternative to centralized finance with the facility of better control over financial investments.

Most important of all, DeFi has the potential of making financial services accessible to the general public. Start exploring more in the world of DeFi right now to understand it better!

The ReadySetCrypto "Three Token Pillars" Community Portfolio (V3)


Add your vote to the V3 Portfolio (Phase 3) by clicking here.

View V3 Portfolio (Phase 2) by clicking here.

View V3 Portfolio (Phase 1) by clicking here.

Read the V3 Portfolio guide by clicking here.

What is the goal of this portfolio?

The “Three Token Pillars” portfolio is democratically proportioned between the Three Pillars of the Token Economy & Interchain:

CryptoCurreny – Security Tokens (STO) – Decentralized Finance (DeFi)

With this portfolio, we will identify and take advantage of the opportunities within the Three
Pillars of ReadySetCrypto. We aim to Capitalise on the collective knowledge and experience of the RSC
community & build model portfolios containing the premier companies and projects
in the industry and manage risk allocation suitable for as many people as

The Second Phase of the RSC Community Portfolio V3 was to give us a general idea of the weightings people desire in each of the three pillars and also member’s risk tolerance. The Third Phase of the RSC Community Portfolio V3 has us closing in on a finalized portfolio allocation before we consolidated onto the highest quality projects.

Our Current Allocation As Of Phase Three:

Move Your Mouse Over Charts Below For More Information

The ReadySetCrypto "Top Ten Crypto" Community Portfolio (V4)


Add your vote to the V4 Portfolio by clicking here.

Read about building Crypto Portfolio Diversity by clicking here.

What is the goal of this portfolio? 

The “Top Ten Crypto” portfolio is a democratically proportioned portfolio balanced based on votes from members of the RSC community as to what they believe are the top 10 projects by potential.
This portfolio should be much more useful given the ever-changing market dynamics. In short, you rank the projects you believe deserve a spot in the top 10. It should represent a portfolio and rank that you believe will stand the test of time. Once we have a good cross-section, we can study and make an assessment as to where we see value and perhaps where some diamonds in the rough opportunities exist. In a perfect world, we will end up with a Pareto-style distribution that describes the largest value capture in the market.
To give an update on the position, each one listed in low to high relative risk:
SoV/money == BTC, DCR
Platforms == ETH, XTZ
Private Money == XMR / ZEC / ZEN
DeFi == MKR / SNX and stablecoins
It is the most realistic way for us to distill the entirety of what we have learned (and that includes the RSC community opinion). We have an array of articles that have gradually picked off one by one different projects, some of which end up being many thousands of words to come to this conclusion. It is not capitulation because we all remain in the market. It is simply a consolidation of quality. We seek the cream of the crop as the milk turns sour on aggregate.

Current Top 10 Rankings:



Move Your Mouse Over Charts Below For More Information

Our Discord

Join Our Crypto Trader & Investor Chatrooms by clicking here!

Please DM us with your email address if you are a full OMNIA member and want to be given full Discord privileges.